Draft affirmative remedial order Decision

2 October 2000 -

A remedial order is an order made by a minister under the Human Rights Act 1998 to amend legislation which has been found incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights. Remedial orders can be used to amend both primary and secondary legislation, and they may do anything necessary to fix the incompatibility with the Convention rights. Draft remedial orders are considered by the Joint Committee on Human Rights and then need to be approved by both Houses to become law.

Work packages before Parliament All work packages Calculation styles Steps Steps with depths Routes Route checker Clocks Step collections

There are 69 steps.

1. AA Decision
2. AB Decision
3. AC Decision
4. AI Decision
5. AJ Decision
6. AK Decision
7. AL Decision
8. ALM AA Decision
9. ALM AB Decision
10. ALM AC Decision
11. ALM AD Decision
12. ALM AE Decision
13. ALM AF Decision
14. ALM AG Decision
15. ALM AI Decision
16. ALM AJ Decision
17. ALM AK Decision
18. ALM AL Decision
19. ALM AM Decision
20. ALM AN Decision
21. ALM AO Decision
22. ALM AP Decision
23. ALM AQ Decision
24. ALM AR Decision
25. ALM AX Decision
26. ALM AY Decision
27. ALM AZ Decision
28. ALM BA Decision
29. ALM BB Decision
30. AM Decision
31. AN Decision
32. AO Decision
33. AP Decision
34. AQ Decision
35. AR Decision
36. AS Decision
37. AT Decision
38. AU Decision
39. BK Decision
40. BL Decision
41. BM Decision
42. BN Decision
43. BO Decision
44. BP Decision
45. BQ Decision
46. BR Decision
47. BS Decision
48. BT Decision
49. BU Decision
50. BV Decision
51. BX Decision
52. BY Decision
53. BZ Decision
54. DACM AA Decision
55. DACM AB Decision
56. DACM AC Decision
57. DACM AD Decision
58. DACM AE Decision
59. DACM AF Decision
60. DACM AG Decision
61. DACM AH Decision
62. DACM AI Decision
63. DACM AJ Decision
64. DACM AK Decision
65. DACM AM Decision
66. EVEL CERT AA Decision
67. EVEL CERT AB Decision
68. EVEL CERT AC Decision
69. EVEL CERT AD Decision

SPARQL queries used by this page

PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> PREFIX : <https://id.parliament.uk/schema/> PREFIX id: <https://id.parliament.uk/> SELECT * WHERE { ?Procedure a :Procedure; :name ?ProcedureName. optional {?Procedure :procedureDescription ?ProcedureDescription.} filter (?Procedure in (id:1HAWKzS2)) optional {?Procedure :startDate ?StartDate.} optional {?Procedure :endDate ?EndDate.} } PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> PREFIX : <https://id.parliament.uk/schema/> PREFIX id: <https://id.parliament.uk/> SELECT distinct ?Procedure ?ProcedureName ?stepType ?stepTypeLabel WHERE { ?Procedure a :Procedure; :name ?ProcedureName. filter (?Procedure in (id:1HAWKzS2)) optional { ?Procedure :procedureHasProcedureRoute ?Route. ?Route :procedureRouteIsFromProcedureStep|:procedureRouteIsToProcedureStep ?step. ?step :procedureStepHasProcedureStepType ?stepType. ?stepType :name ?stepTypeLabel.} filter (?stepType in (id:NgLRLaVh)) } PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> PREFIX : <https://id.parliament.uk/schema/> PREFIX id: <https://id.parliament.uk/> SELECT distinct ?Procedure ?ProcedureName ?stepType ?stepTypeLabel ?step ?stepName ?legislature ?legislatureName ?CommonsId ?LordsId WHERE { ?Procedure a :Procedure; :name ?ProcedureName. filter (?Procedure in (id:1HAWKzS2)) optional { ?Procedure :procedureHasProcedureRoute ?Route. ?Route :procedureRouteIsFromProcedureStep|:procedureRouteIsToProcedureStep ?step. ?step :name ?stepName. ?step :procedureStepHasProcedureStepType ?stepType. ?stepType :name ?stepTypeLabel.} Optional {?step :procedureStepInLegislature ?legislature. ?legislature :name ?legislatureName.} Optional {?step :procedureStepHasHouse ?CommonsId filter (?CommonsId IN (id:1AFu55Hs))} Optional {?step :procedureStepHasHouse ?LordsId. filter (?LordsId IN (id:WkUWUBMx))} filter (?stepType in (id:NgLRLaVh)) } order by ?stepType ?stepName