Legislative reform order: Lords debates Instrument has been determined to follow the negative procedure

Overview Work packages Calculation styles Steps Steps with depths Routes Route checker Clocks Step collections

A legislative reform order has been determined to follow the negative procedure if the minister has recommended such a procedure and neither House has agreed to upgrade the order to follow an affirmative procedure.

There are 0 business items.

Procedure identifier

https://id.parliament.uk/QphyqYDL

SPARQL queries used by this page

PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
      PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>
      PREFIX : <https://id.parliament.uk/schema/>
      PREFIX id: <https://id.parliament.uk/>
      SELECT distinct ?Procedure ?ProcedureName ?step ?stepName ?description ?legislature ?legislatureName ?CommonsId ?LordsId ?stepType ?stepTypeLabel WHERE {
        ?Procedure a :Procedure;
                   :name ?ProcedureName.
           filter (?Procedure in (id:QphyqYDL))
        optional {  ?Procedure :procedureHasProcedureRoute ?Route.
          ?Route :procedureRouteIsFromProcedureStep|:procedureRouteIsToProcedureStep ?step.
          optional {?step :procedureStepDescription ?description}
          ?step :name ?stepName.
        ?step :procedureStepHasProcedureStepType ?stepType.
               ?stepType :name ?stepTypeLabel.}
          Optional {?step :procedureStepInLegislature ?legislature.
          ?legislature :name ?legislatureName.}
          Optional {?step :procedureStepHasHouse ?CommonsId
          filter (?CommonsId IN (id:1AFu55Hs))}
          Optional {?step :procedureStepHasHouse ?LordsId.
            filter (?LordsId IN (id:WkUWUBMx))}
        filter (?step IN (id:iEmepEGo))
        } order by ?stepName

PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
      PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>
      PREFIX : <https://id.parliament.uk/schema/>
      PREFIX id: <https://id.parliament.uk/>
      SELECT distinct ?businessItem ?businessItemDate ?businessItemLink ?workPackage ?workPackagedThing ?workPackagedThingName ?madeAvailableDate ?Procedure ?ProcedureName ?step ?stepName ?legislature ?legislatureName ?CommonsId ?LordsId ?stepType ?stepTypeLabel  WHERE {
        ?Procedure a :Procedure;
                   :name ?ProcedureName.
           filter (?Procedure in (id:QphyqYDL))
        ?Procedure :procedureHasWorkPackage ?workPackage.
        ?workPackage :workPackageHasWorkPackagedThing ?workPackagedThing.
        ?workPackagedThing :name ?workPackagedThingName. 
        optional {  ?Procedure :procedureHasProcedureRoute ?Route.
          ?Route :procedureRouteIsFromProcedureStep|:procedureRouteIsToProcedureStep ?step.
          ?step :name ?stepName.
        ?step :procedureStepHasProcedureStepType ?stepType.
               ?stepType :name ?stepTypeLabel.}
          Optional {?step :procedureStepInLegislature ?legislature.
          ?legislature :name ?legislatureName.}
          Optional {?step :procedureStepHasHouse ?CommonsId
          filter (?CommonsId IN (id:1AFu55Hs))}
          Optional {?step :procedureStepHasHouse ?LordsId.
            filter (?LordsId IN (id:WkUWUBMx))}
        filter (?step IN (id:iEmepEGo))
       ?step :procedureStepHasBusinessItem ?businessItem.
        optional{ ?businessItem :businessItemDate ?businessItemDate.}
              optional {?businessItem :businessItemHasBusinessItemWebLink ?businessItemLink }
        ?businessItem :businessItemHasWorkPackage ?workPackage.
       optional {?workPackage :workPackageHasBusinessItem ?bi1 .
                  ?bi1 :businessItemHasProcedureStep ?madeAvailable;
                         :businessItemDate ?madeAvailableDate.
                  filter (?madeAvailable in (id:isWn7s3K, id:cspzmb6w, id:ITNO9JWr, id:otscOTzB))}
         }  order by DESC(?businessItemDate)  ?workPackagedThingName