Procedure browser

Proposed negative statutory instrument Steps with depths

A Minister may exercise powers under the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018 or the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023 to propose that instruments be subject to the proposed negative procedure. After a proposed negative instrument has been laid, each House has ten sitting days in which it may consider the instrument and agree with the proposal of the Minister, or instead recommend the instrument be subject to the draft affirmative procedure. In the Commons, the instrument is considered by the European Statutory Instruments Committee. In the Lords, the instrument is considered by the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee. Any result of consideration does not bind a Minister, who must nevertheless make a written statement if disagreeing with a recommendation of a committee.

Follows the calculation style Proposed negative statutory instruments.

Overview Work packages Calculation styles Steps Steps with depths Routes Route checker Clocks Step collections

There are 18 steps.

  1. Proposed negative statutory instrument created

    With step depth 1.

  2. Laid before the House of Commons (House of Commons)

    With step depth 2.

  3. Laid before the House of Lords (House of Lords)

    With step depth 2.

  4. Proposed negative statutory instrument withdrawn from the House of Commons (House of Commons)

    With step depth 3.

  5. Proposed negative statutory instrument withdrawn from the House of Lords (House of Lords)

    With step depth 3.

  6. Considered by the European Statutory Instruments Committee (ESIC) (House of Commons)

    With step depth 4.

  7. European Statutory Instruments Committee (ESIC) agreed that the instrument should follow the negative procedure (House of Commons)

    With step depth 4.09999990463257.

  8. European Statutory Instruments Committee (ESIC) recommended that the instrument should follow the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)

    With step depth 4.09999990463257.

  9. Ministerial statement of disagreement with sifting recommendation (House of Commons)

    With step depth 4.19999980926514.

  10. Considered by the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC) (House of Lords)

    With step depth 5.

  11. Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC) recommended that the instrument should follow the affirmative procedure (House of Lords)

    With step depth 5.09999990463257.

  12. Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC) agreed that the instrument should follow the negative procedure (House of Lords)

    With step depth 5.09999990463257.

  13. Ministerial statement of disagreement with sifting recommendation (House of Lords)

    With step depth 5.19999980926514.

  14. Further information published by the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC) (House of Lords)

    With step depth 5.30000019073486.

  15. Committee sifting period ends

    With step depth 6.

  16. Statutory instrument can be laid under the negative procedure

    With step depth 6.09999990463257.

  17. Statutory instrument should be laid under the affirmative procedure

    With step depth 6.09999990463257.

  18. Procedure concluded in the House of Commons and the House of Lords (House of Commons and House of Lords)

    With step depth 7.

Procedure identifier

https://id.parliament.uk/iCdMN1MW

SPARQL queries used by this page