Proposed draft remedial order Routes

Remedial orders are a type of statutory instrument. Under the Human Rights Act 1998, courts can declare Acts of Parliament incompatible with the European convention on human rights. The Government can use remedial orders to amend Acts to remove the incompatibility. A minister formally presents (or ‘lays’) a proposal for a draft remedial order. Parliament has 60 days to consider the proposal. The Joint Committee on Human Rights (a Committee of Members of the Commons and Lords) also scrutinises the proposal. At the end of the 60-day period, the minister can lay a draft remedial order. The minister has to report details of any representations made during the 60 days and any changes made to the proposal.

Follows the calculation style Bicameral instruments (clock stops if either House rises).

Overview Work packages Calculation styles Steps Steps with depths Routes Route checker Clocks Step collections

There are 105 routes.

1. A Route from AA AND to Laid before the House of Commons (House of Commons)

2. A Route from AA Decision to Proposal for a draft remedial order withdrawn from the House of Commons (House of Commons)

3. A Route from AA EQUALS to AE NOT

4. A Route from AA NOT to Proposal for a draft remedial order created

5. A Route from AA OR to AF AND

6. A Route from AA SUM to AA EQUALS

7. A Route from AB AND to AA Decision

8. A Route from AB Decision to Government response to the decision made by the Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) (House of Commons and House of Lords)

9. A Route from AB NOT to AA AND

10. A Route from AB OR to AA OR

11. A Route from AB SUM to AA SUM

12. A Route from AC AND to AD AND

13. A Route from AC Decision to Drawn to the special attention of the House by the Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) (House of Commons and House of Lords)

14. A Route from AC NOT to AB AND

15. A Route from AC SUM to AB SUM

16. A Route from AD AND to AE AND

17. A Route from AD Decision to Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) recommends a draft Order be laid in the same terms as the proposal (House of Commons and House of Lords)

18. A Route from AD NOT to AE AND

19. A Route from AD SUM to AC SUM

20. A Route from AE AND to Considered by the Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) (House of Commons and House of Lords)

21. A Route from AE Decision to Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) recommends a draft Order be laid in an amended form (House of Commons and House of Lords)

22. A Route from AE NOT to PRO AA Summation

23. A Route from AE SUM to AD SUM

24. A Route from AF AND to Procedure concluded in the House of Commons and the House of Lords (House of Commons and House of Lords)

25. A Route from AF Decision to Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) recommends there should be no draft Order and the Government should bring forward primary legislation (House of Commons and House of Lords)

26. A Route from AF NOT to AF AND

27. A Route from AG AND to Laid before the House of Lords (House of Lords)

28. A Route from AG Decision to Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) recommends the Order be laid under the urgent procedure in an amended form (House of Commons and House of Lords)

29. A Route from AG NOT to AG AND

30. A Route from AH AND to AI Decision

31. A Route from AH Decision to Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) recommends the Order be laid under the urgent procedure in the same terms as the proposal (House of Commons and House of Lords)

32. A Route from AH NOT to AH AND

33. A Route from AI AND to AJ AND

34. A Route from AI Decision to Proposal for a draft remedial order withdrawn from the House of Lords (House of Lords)

35. A Route from AI NOT to AJ AND

36. A Route from AJ AND to Proposed Remedial Order scrutiny period ends

37. A Route from AJ Decision to Statement informing the House that a proposal for a draft remedial order has been laid (House of Commons)

38. A Route from AJ NOT to PRO AB Summation

39. A Route from AK AND to AJ Decision

40. A Route from AK Decision to Statement informing the House that a proposal for a draft remedial order has been laid (House of Lords)

41. A Route from AK NOT to AK AND

42. A Route from AL AND to AK Decision

43. A Route from AL Decision to Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) recommended a draft remedial order be laid and the Government reconsider the drafting of the order (House of Commons and House of Lords)

44. A Route from AL NOT to AL AND

45. A Route from AM AND to AM Decision

46. A Route from AM Decision to Call for evidence opened by the Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) (House of Commons and House of Lords)

47. A Route from AM NOT to AS AND

48. A Route from AN AND to AM AND

49. A Route from AN Decision to Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) inquiry opened (House of Commons and House of Lords)

50. A Route from AN NOT to AQ AND

51. A Route from AO AND to AN AND

52. A Route from AO NOT to AM AND

53. A Route from AP AND to AQ AND

54. A Route from AQ AND to AR AND

55. A Route from AR AND to AS AND

56. A Route from AS AND to AN Decision

57. A Route from Considered by the Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) (House of Commons and House of Lords) to AA EQUALS

58. A Route from Considered by the Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) (House of Commons and House of Lords) to AB Decision

59. A Route from Considered by the Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) (House of Commons and House of Lords) to AC Decision

60. A Route from Considered by the Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) (House of Commons and House of Lords) to AD NOT

61. A Route from Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) inquiry opened (House of Commons and House of Lords) to AM NOT

62. A Route from Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) recommended a draft remedial order be laid and the Government reconsider the drafting of the order (House of Commons and House of Lords) to AE SUM

63. A Route from Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) recommends a draft Order be laid in an amended form (House of Commons and House of Lords) to AD SUM

64. A Route from Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) recommends a draft Order be laid in the same terms as the proposal (House of Commons and House of Lords) to AB SUM

65. A Route from Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) recommends the Order be laid under the urgent procedure in an amended form (House of Commons and House of Lords) to AC SUM

66. A Route from Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) recommends the Order be laid under the urgent procedure in the same terms as the proposal (House of Commons and House of Lords) to AE SUM

67. A Route from Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) recommends there should be no draft Order and the Government should bring forward primary legislation (House of Commons and House of Lords) to AA SUM

68. A Route from Laid before the House of Commons (House of Commons) to AB AND

69. A Route from Laid before the House of Commons (House of Commons) to AB NOT

70. A Route from Laid before the House of Commons (House of Commons) to AC AND

71. A Route from Laid before the House of Commons (House of Commons) to AI AND

72. A Route from Laid before the House of Commons (House of Commons) to AK AND

73. A Route from Laid before the House of Commons (House of Commons) to AO AND

74. A Route from Laid before the House of Commons (House of Commons) to AP AND

75. A Route from Laid before the House of Lords (House of Lords) to AC AND

76. A Route from Laid before the House of Lords (House of Lords) to AG NOT

77. A Route from Laid before the House of Lords (House of Lords) to AH AND

78. A Route from Laid before the House of Lords (House of Lords) to AI AND

79. A Route from Laid before the House of Lords (House of Lords) to AL AND

80. A Route from Laid before the House of Lords (House of Lords) to AO AND

81. A Route from Laid before the House of Lords (House of Lords) to AP AND

82. A Route from PRO AA Summation to AD Decision

83. A Route from PRO AA Summation to AE Decision

84. A Route from PRO AA Summation to AF Decision

85. A Route from PRO AA Summation to AG Decision

86. A Route from PRO AA Summation to AH Decision

87. A Route from PRO AA Summation to AL Decision

88. A Route from PRO AB Summation to AD AND

89. A Route from PRO AB Summation to AN AND

90. A Route from PRO AB Summation to AR AND

91. A Route from Procedure concluded in the House of Commons and the House of Lords (House of Commons and House of Lords) to AF NOT

92. A Route from Proposal for a draft remedial order created to AA AND

93. A Route from Proposal for a draft remedial order created to AA NOT

94. A Route from Proposal for a draft remedial order created to AG AND

95. A Route from Proposal for a draft remedial order withdrawn from the House of Commons (House of Commons) to AB OR

96. A Route from Proposal for a draft remedial order withdrawn from the House of Commons (House of Commons) to AC NOT

97. A Route from Proposal for a draft remedial order withdrawn from the House of Commons (House of Commons) to AN NOT

98. A Route from Proposal for a draft remedial order withdrawn from the House of Lords (House of Lords) to AA OR

99. A Route from Proposal for a draft remedial order withdrawn from the House of Lords (House of Lords) to AH NOT

100. A Route from Proposal for a draft remedial order withdrawn from the House of Lords (House of Lords) to AO NOT

101. A Route from Proposed Remedial Order scrutiny period ends to AB OR

102. A Route from Proposed Remedial Order scrutiny period ends to AI NOT

103. A Route from Proposed Remedial Order scrutiny period ends to AJ NOT

104. A Route from Statement informing the House that a proposal for a draft remedial order has been laid (House of Commons) to AK NOT

105. A Route from Statement informing the House that a proposal for a draft remedial order has been laid (House of Lords) to AL NOT

SPARQL queries used by this page

PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> PREFIX : <https://id.parliament.uk/schema/> PREFIX id: <https://id.parliament.uk/> SELECT * WHERE { ?Procedure a :Procedure; :name ?ProcedureName. optional {?Procedure :procedureDescription ?ProcedureDescription.} optional {?Procedure :procedureHasCalculationStyle ?procedureCalculationStyle. ?procedureCalculationStyle :name ?procedureCalculationStyleName. } filter (?Procedure in (id:OvnVdtXG)) optional {?Procedure :startDate ?StartDate.} optional {?Procedure :endDate ?EndDate.} } PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> PREFIX : <https://id.parliament.uk/schema/> PREFIX id: <https://id.parliament.uk/> SELECT * WHERE { ?Procedure a :Procedure; :name ?ProcedureName. filter (?Procedure in (id:OvnVdtXG)) ?Procedure :procedureHasProcedureRoute ?Route. Optional { ?Route :startDate ?StartDate. } Optional {?Route :endDate ?EndDate.} ?Route :procedureRouteIsFromProcedureStep ?FromStep. ?FromStep :name ?FromStepName; :procedureStepHasProcedureStepType ?FromStepType. ?FromStepType :name ?FromStepTypeName. Optional {?FromStep :procedureStepInLegislature ?FromSteplegislature. ?FromSteplegislature :name ?FromSteplegislatureName.} Optional {?FromStep:procedureStepHasHouse ?FromStepCommonsId filter (?FromStepCommonsId IN (id:1AFu55Hs))} Optional {?FromStep :procedureStepHasHouse ?FromStepLordsId. filter (?FromStepLordsId IN (id:WkUWUBMx))} ?Route :procedureRouteIsToProcedureStep ?ToStep. ?ToStep :name ?ToStepName; :procedureStepHasProcedureStepType ?ToStepType. ?ToStepType :name ?ToStepTypeName. Optional {?ToStep :procedureStepInLegislature ?ToSteplegislature. ?ToSteplegislature :name ?ToSteplegislatureName.} Optional {?ToStep:procedureStepHasHouse ?ToStepCommonsId filter (?ToStepCommonsId IN (id:1AFu55Hs))} Optional {?ToStep :procedureStepHasHouse ?ToStepLordsId. filter (?ToStepLordsId IN (id:WkUWUBMx))} } Order by ?FromStepName ?FromStepTypeName ?ToStepName ?ToStepTypeName