Legislative reform order: Commons procedure determination Business step

There are 45 steps.

Step	Actualisation count
Business and Trade Committee (BTC) agreed the instrument should follow the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)	0
Business and Trade Committee (BTC) agreed the instrument should follow the negative procedure (House of Commons)	0
Business and Trade Committee (BTC) agreed the instrument should follow the super-affirmative procedure (House of Commons)	0
Business and Trade Committee (BTC) recommended the instrument should be upgraded to the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)	0
Business and Trade Committee (BTC) recommended the instrument should be upgraded to the super-affirmative procedure (House of Commons)	0
Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee agreed the instrument should follow the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)	0
Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee agreed the instrument should follow the negative procedure (House of Commons)	0
Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee agreed the instrument should follow the super-affirmative procedure (House of Commons)	0
Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee recommended the instrument should be upgraded to the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)	0
Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee recommended the instrument should be upgraded to the super-affirmative procedure (House of Commons)	0
Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee agreed the instrument should follow the affirmative procedure	0
Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee agreed the instrument should follow the negative procedure (House of Commons)	0
Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee agreed the instrument should follow the super-affirmative procedure (House of Commons)	0
Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee recommended that the instrument should be upgraded to the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)	0
Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee recommended that the instrument should be upgraded to the super-affirmative procedure (House of Commons)	0
Debate on motion to disagree with the procedure recommendation made by the Commons committee (House of Commons)	0
Decision on motion to disagree with the procedure recommendation made by the Commons committee deferred (House of Commons)	0
Government response to procedure recommendation by the Business and Trade Committee (BTC) (House of Commons)	0
Government response to procedure recommendation by the Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee (House of Commons)	0
Government response to the procedure recommendation by the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee (House of Commons)	0
Government response to the procedure recommendation by the Regulatory Reform Committee (RRC) (House of Commons)	0
House of Commons agreed to the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)	0
House of Commons agreed to the negative procedure (House of Commons)	0
House of Commons agreed to the super-affirmative procedure (House of Commons)	0
House resolved against committee procedure recommendation (House of Commons)	0
House resolved in favour of committee procedure recommendation (House of Commons)	0
Instrument withdrawn from the House of Commons (House of Commons)	0
Minister recommended the instrument follow the affirmative procedure	0
Minister recommended the instrument follow the negative procedure (House of Commons and House of Lords)	0
Minister recommended the instrument follow the super-affirmative procedure (House of Commons and House of Lords)	0
Motion to disagree with the procedure recommendation made by the Commons committee lapsed at the end of the session (House of Commons)	0
Motion to disagree with the procedure recommendation made by the Commons committee not moved (House of Commons)	0
Motion to disagree with the procedure recommendation made by the Commons committee tabled (House of Commons)	0
Motion to disagree with the procedure recommendation made by the Commons committee withdrawn (House of Commons)	0
Procedure considered by the Business and Trade Committee (BTC) (House of Commons)	0
Procedure considered by the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee (House of Commons)	0
Procedure considered by the Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee (House of Commons)	0
Procedure considered by the Regulatory Reform Committee (RRC) (House of Commons)	0
Procedure determination period ends	0
Question put on motion to disagree with the procedure recommendation made by the Commons committee (House of Commons)	0
Regulatory Reform Committee (RRC) agreed the instrument should follow the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)	0
Regulatory Reform Committee (RRC) agreed the instrument should follow the negative procedure (House of Commons)	0
Regulatory Reform Committee (RRC) agreed the instrument should follow the super-affirmative procedure (House of Commons)	0
Regulatory Reform Committee (RRC) recommended the instrument should be upgraded to the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)	0
Regulatory Reform Committee (RRC) recommended the instrument should be upgraded to the super-affirmative procedure (House of Commons)	0

Procedure identifier

https://id.parliament.uk/TDAfUhJs

SPARQL queries used by this page

A list of steps of a type within a procedure

# We declare the Parliament and ID namespaces.
PREFIX : <https://id.parliament.uk/schema/>
PREFIX id: <https://id.parliament.uk/>

# We select the properties we want to appear in results. If all properties are required, an asterisk can be used between SELECT and WHERE instead of listing properties.
SELECT DISTINCT ?procedure ?procedureName ?stepType ?stepTypeLabel ?step ?stepName ?legislature ?legislatureName ?commonsId ?lordsId (COALESCE(?rawBiCount, 0) AS ?biCount) WHERE {

# We set the value of the procedure property.   
VALUES ?procedure { id:TDAfUhJs }

# We specify that the procedure property is a procedure and look for its name.   
?procedure a :Procedure;
:name ?procedureName.

# We look for all procedure routes and the steps in those routes, including whether they are a From step or a To step. The pipe in line 17 is a SPARQL OR.  
?procedure :procedureHasProcedureRoute ?route.
?route :procedureRouteIsFromProcedureStep|:procedureRouteIsToProcedureStep ?step.

# We specify the procedure step must have a name, a step type and that the step type also has a name.   
?step :name ?stepName.
?step :procedureStepHasProcedureStepType ?stepType.
?stepType :name ?stepTypeLabel.

# We limit steps to being only of the type 'Business step'.
FILTER (?stepType in (id:Jwc6nqJi))

# We check to see if the step belongs to a legislature. A legislature will be Scottish Parliament, Senedd Cymru or the Northern Ireland Assembly.   
OPTIONAL {?step :procedureStepInLegislature ?legislature .
?legislature :name ?legislatureName .}

# We check to see if the step belongs to the House of Commons.     
OPTIONAL {?step :procedureStepHasHouse ?commonsId .
FILTER (?commonsId = id:1AFu55Hs)}

# We check to see if the step belongs to the House of Lords.   
OPTIONAL {?step :procedureStepHasHouse ?lordsId .
FILTER (?lordsId = id:WkUWUBMx)}

# We specify an optional subquery which calculates the number of distinct business items that actualise a steps from the procedure. We make it optional because not every step will be actualised in a business item.   
OPTIONAL {
SELECT ?step (COUNT(DISTINCT ?bi) AS ?rawBiCount)
WHERE {
# We find business items actualising the step. 
?step :procedureStepHasBusinessItem ?bi .

# We find the work package each business item belongs to.
?bi :businessItemHasWorkPackage ?wp.

# We specify that the work packages must have the procedure. 
?wp :workPackageHasProcedure id:TDAfUhJs.}

# We group the results by step.    
GROUP BY ?step}
}

# We order the results by step name. 
ORDER BY ?stepName