Legislative reform order: Commons procedure determination Business step

There are 39 steps.

1. Business and Trade Committee (BTC) agreed the instrument should follow the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)
2. Business and Trade Committee (BTC) agreed the instrument should follow the negative procedure (House of Commons)
3. Business and Trade Committee (BTC) agreed the instrument should follow the super-affirmative procedure (House of Commons)
4. Business and Trade Committee (BTC) recommended the instrument should be upgraded to the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)
5. Business and Trade Committee (BTC) recommended the instrument should be upgraded to the super-affirmative procedure (House of Commons)
6. Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee agreed the instrument should follow the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)
7. Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee agreed the instrument should follow the negative procedure (House of Commons)
8. Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee agreed the instrument should follow the super-affirmative procedure (House of Commons)
9. Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee recommended the instrument should be upgraded to the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)
10. Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee recommended the instrument should be upgraded to the super-affirmative procedure (House of Commons)
11. Debate on motion to disagree with the procedure recommendation made by the Commons committee (House of Commons)
12. Decision on motion to disagree with the procedure recommendation made by the Commons committee deferred (House of Commons)
13. Government response to procedure recommendation by the Business and Trade Committee (House of Commons)
14. Government response to the procedure recommendation by the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee (House of Commons)
15. Government response to the procedure recommendation by the Regulatory Reform Committee (RRC) (House of Commons)
16. House of Commons agreed to the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)
17. House of Commons agreed to the negative procedure (House of Commons)
18. House of Commons agreed to the super-affirmative procedure (House of Commons)
19. House resolved against committee procedure recommendation (House of Commons)
20. House resolved in favour of committee procedure recommendation (House of Commons)
21. Instrument withdrawn from the House of Commons (House of Commons)
22. Minister recommended the instrument follow the affirmative procedure
23. Minister recommended the instrument follow the negative procedure (House of Commons and House of Lords)
24. Minister recommended the instrument follow the super-affirmative procedure (House of Commons and House of Lords)
25. Motion to disagree with the procedure recommendation made by the Commons committee lapsed at the end of the session (House of Commons)
26. Motion to disagree with the procedure recommendation made by the Commons committee not called (House of Commons)
27. Motion to disagree with the procedure recommendation made by the Commons committee not moved (House of Commons)
28. Motion to disagree with the procedure recommendation made by the Commons committee tabled (House of Commons)
29. Motion to disagree with the procedure recommendation made by the Commons committee withdrawn (House of Commons)
30. Procedure considered by the Business and Trade Committee (House of Commons)
31. Procedure considered by the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee (House of Commons)
32. Procedure considered by the Regulatory Reform Committee (RRC) (House of Commons)
33. Procedure determination period ends
34. Question put on motion to disagree with the procedure recommendation made by the Commons committee (House of Commons)
35. Regulatory Reform Committee (RRC) agreed the instrument should follow the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)
36. Regulatory Reform Committee (RRC) agreed the instrument should follow the negative procedure (House of Commons)
37. Regulatory Reform Committee (RRC) agreed the instrument should follow the super-affirmative procedure (House of Commons)
38. Regulatory Reform Committee (RRC) recommended the instrument should be upgraded to the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)
39. Regulatory Reform Committee (RRC) recommended the instrument should be upgraded to the super-affirmative procedure (House of Commons)