Committee concerns steps
There are 52 steps.
- Business and Trade Committee recommended a debate on a substantive motion take place during period A (House of Commons)
- Business and Trade Committee recommended a general debate (House of Commons)
- Business and Trade Committee recommended that objection period A be extended (House of Commons)
- Business and Trade Committee recommended that objection period A be extended (House of Commons)
- Business and Trade Committee recommended that the treaty should not be ratified (House of Commons)
- Business and Trade Committee recommends that the instrument should be upgraded to the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)
- Business and Trade Committee recommends that the instrument should be upgraded to the super-affirmative procedure (House of Commons)
- Business and Trade Committee reports that the instrument is not appropriate to be made (House of Commons)
- Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee recommends that the instrument should be upgraded to the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)
- Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee recommends that the instrument should be upgraded to the super-affirmative procedure (House of Commons)
- Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee reports that the instrument is not appropriate to be made (House of Commons)
- Concerns raised by the Business and Trade Committee (House of Commons)
- Concerns raised by the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee (House of Commons)
- Concerns raised by the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee (DPRRC) (House of Lords)
- Concerns raised by the Regulatory Reform Committee (RRC) (House of Commons)
- Concerns raised by the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC) (House of Lords)
- Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee (DPRRC) reports that the instrument is not appropriate to be made (House of Lords)
- Drawn to the special attention of the House by the European Affairs Committee (EAC) (House of Lords)
- Drawn to the special attention of the House by the European Union Committee (House of Lords)
- Drawn to the special attention of the House by the International Agreements Committee (IAC) (House of Lords)
- Drawn to the special attention of the House by the Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) (House of Commons and House of Lords)
- Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee made recommendations about how the treaty should be implemented (House of Commons)
- Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee made recommendations about what lessons could be learnt for future treaties (House of Commons)
- European Affairs Committee (EAC) called for a debate on the treaty (House of Lords)
- European Union Committee called for a debate on the treaty (House of Lords)
- Instrument drawn to the special attention of the House by the Select Committee on Statutory Instruments (SCSI) (House of Commons)
- Instrument drawn to the special attention of the Houses by the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments (JCSI) (House of Commons and House of Lords)
- International Agreements Committee (IAC) called for a debate on the treaty (House of Lords)
- International Trade Committee (ITC) recommended Members should vote against ratification in any debate on a substantive motion during period A (House of Commons)
- International Trade Committee (ITC) recommended a debate on a substantive motion take place during period A (House of Commons)
- International Trade Committee (ITC) recommended a general debate (House of Commons)
- International Trade Committee (ITC) recommended that objection period A be extended (House of Commons)
- International Trade Committee (ITC) recommended the treaty should not be ratified (House of Commons)
- International Trade Committee (ITC) requested the recommended debate on a substantive motion take place during period A (House of Commons)
- Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) recommended a draft remedial order be laid and the Government reconsider the drafting of the order (House of Commons and House of Lords)
- Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) recommended that objection period A be extended (House of Commons and House of Lords)
- Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) recommended that the treaty should be debated in both Houses (House of Commons and House of Lords)
- Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) recommended that the treaty should not be ratified (House of Commons and House of Lords)
- Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) recommends a draft Order be laid in an amended form (House of Commons and House of Lords)
- Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) recommends the Order be laid under the urgent procedure in an amended form (House of Commons and House of Lords)
- Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) recommends the draft Order should not be approved (House of Commons and House of Lords)
- Noted as an instrument of interest by the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC) (House of Lords)
- Preliminary report by the International Trade Committee (ITC) recommended that a debate be held during period A (House of Commons)
- Preliminary report by the International Trade Committee (ITC) recommended that objection period A be extended (House of Commons)
- Preliminary report by the International Trade Committee (ITC) recommended that, should period A not be extended, there should be a debate on a substantive motion during period A (House of Commons)
- Recommendations made by the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC) (House of Lords)
- Regulatory Reform Committee (RRC) reports that the instrument is not appropriate to be made (House of Commons)
- Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC) makes recommendations on published draft (House of Lords)
- The Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee (DPRRC) recommends that the instrument should be upgraded to the affirmative procedure (House of Lords)
- The Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee (DPRRC) recommends that the instrument should be upgraded to the super-affirmative procedure (House of Lords)
- The Regulatory Reform Committee (RRC) recommends that the instrument should be upgraded to the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)
- The Regulatory Reform Committee (RRC) recommends that the instrument should be upgraded to the super-affirmative procedure (House of Commons)