Debate on a motion that subsections (6) to (9) of section 268 of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 should apply Routes

Under section 268 of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016, the enhanced affirmative procedure usually follows a 40 day period before the instrument can be approved. However, under subsection 5 either House of Parliament can resolve with a 30-day period to extend the approval period to 60 days. The procedure that enables either House allows for a motion to be tabled, debated and approved or rejected. Such a motion can be withdrawn, lapse at the end of a session, not be called or not be moved.

Overview Business items Routes Clocks Step collections Procedures with step depths Procedures

There are 2 routes.

A Route from BH Decision to Debate on a motion that subsections (6) to (9) of section 268 of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 should apply (House of Lords) as part of the Enhanced affirmative: Investigatory Powers Act 2016 procedure
A Route from Debate on a motion that subsections (6) to (9) of section 268 of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 should apply (House of Lords) to BQ NOT as part of the Enhanced affirmative: Investigatory Powers Act 2016 procedure

Step identifier

https://id.parliament.uk/B2LaetF9

SPARQL queries used by this page

PREFIX id: <https://id.parliament.uk/>
      PREFIX : <https://id.parliament.uk/schema/>
      PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
      PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>
      SELECT ?Step ?stepName  ?description ?scopeNote ?linkNote ?dateNote ?publicationName ?publicationUrl ?stepType ?stepTypeLabel ?CommonsId ?LordsId ?legislature ?legislatureName WHERE {

?Step a :ProcedureStep;
                  :name ?stepName;
                  :procedureStepHasProcedureStepType ?stepType.
        ?stepType :name ?stepTypeLabel.
        optional { ?Step :procedureStepDescription ?description}
        optional {?Step  :procedureStepHasProcedureStepPublication ?publication.
        ?publication :procedureStepPublicationName ?publicationName;
        :procedureStepPublicationUrl ?publicationUrl.}
        optional {?Step  :procedureStepScopeNote ?scopeNote}
        optional {?Step  :procedureStepLinkNote ?linkNote}
        optional {?Step  :procedureStepDateNote ?dateNote}
         optional {?Step :procedureStepInLegislature ?legislature.
          ?legislature :name ?legislatureName.}
        optional {?Step :procedureStepHasHouse ?CommonsId.
              filter (?CommonsId IN (id:1AFu55Hs))}
        optional {?Step :procedureStepHasHouse ?LordsId.
             filter (?LordsId IN (id:WkUWUBMx))}
        filter (?Step IN (id:B2LaetF9))}

PREFIX id: <https://id.parliament.uk/>
      PREFIX : <https://id.parliament.uk/schema/>
      PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
      PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>
      SELECT ?Route ?startDate ?endDate ?procedure ?procedureLabel ?FromStep ?FromStepName ?FromStepType ?FromStepTypeName ?FromStepCommonsId ?FromStepLordsId ?FromSteplegislature ?FromSteplegislatureName ?ToStep ?ToStepName ?ToStepType ?ToStepTypeName ?ToStepCommonsId ?ToStepLordsId ?ToSteplegislature ?ToSteplegislatureName WHERE {

?Step a :ProcedureStep;
                  :name ?stepName.
              ?Step :procedureStepIsFromProcedureRoute | :procedureStepIsToProcedureRoute ?Route.
         optional {?Route:procedureRouteStartDate ?startDate}
        optional {?Route :procedureRouteEndDate ?endDate}
        ?Route :procedureRouteHasProcedure ?procedure.
        ?procedure :name ?procedureLabel.
        ?Route :procedureRouteIsFromProcedureStep ?FromStep.
        ?Route :procedureRouteIsToProcedureStep ?ToStep.
        ?FromStep :name ?FromStepName;
                  :procedureStepHasProcedureStepType ?FromStepType.
          ?FromStepType :name ?FromStepTypeName. 
      ?ToStep :name ?ToStepName;
              :procedureStepHasProcedureStepType ?ToStepType.
          ?ToStepType :name ?ToStepTypeName.
          optional {?FromStep :procedureStepHasHouse ?FromStepCommonsId.
                    filter (?FromStepCommonsId IN (id:1AFu55Hs))}
              optional {?FromStep :procedureStepHasHouse ?FromStepLordsId.
          filter (?FromStepLordsId IN (id:WkUWUBMx))}
          optional {?FromStep :procedureStepInLegislature ?FromSteplegislature.
                ?FromSteplegislature :name ?FromSteplegislatureName.}
        optional {?ToStep :procedureStepHasHouse ?ToStepCommonsId.
                    filter (?ToStepCommonsId IN (id:1AFu55Hs))}
              optional {?ToStep :procedureStepHasHouse ?ToStepLordsId.
          filter (?ToStepLordsId IN (id:WkUWUBMx))}
          optional {?ToStep :procedureStepInLegislature ?ToSteplegislature.
                ?ToSteplegislature :name ?ToSteplegislatureName.}
          filter (?Step IN (id:B2LaetF9))
      } Order by ?procedureLabel ?FromStepName

Debate on a motion that subsections (6) to (9) of section 268 of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 should apply Routes

A Route from BH Decision to Debate on a motion that subsections (6) to (9) of section 268 of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 should apply (House of Lords) as part of the Enhanced affirmative: Investigatory Powers Act 2016 procedure

A Route from Debate on a motion that subsections (6) to (9) of section 268 of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 should apply (House of Lords) to BQ NOT as part of the Enhanced affirmative: Investigatory Powers Act 2016 procedure

Step identifier