House of Commons agrees to the affirmative procedure Business items

House of Commons

A step of type Business step.

The way legislative reform orders are scrutinised is not fixed. When ministers lay a draft legislative reform order, they propose what level of scrutiny it should face. For the House of Commons to agree to the affirmative procedure a committee can either agree with the Minister's recommendation, or the committee may decide the recommended negative procedure should be upgraded to the affirmative or the House can resolve against a Committee's decision to upgrade to a super-affirmative procedure.

Overview Business items Routes Clocks Step collections Procedures with step depths Procedures

There are 5 business items.

RSS

1. Legislative Reform (Provision of Information etc. Relating to Disabilities) Order 2022

   On 28 June 2022, as part of a work package subject to the Legislative Reform Order procedure.

2. Legislative Reform (Renewal of National Radio Multiplex Licences) Order 2022

   On 15 March 2022, as part of a work package subject to the Legislative Reform Order procedure.

3. Legislative Reform (Renewal of Radio Licences) Order 2020

   On 22 July 2020, as part of a work package subject to the Legislative Reform Order procedure.

4. Legislative Reform (Constitution of the Council of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons) Order 2018

   On 18 April 2018, as part of a work package subject to the Legislative Reform Order procedure.

5. Legislative Reform (Regulator of Social Housing) (England) Order 2018

   On 18 April 2018, as part of a work package subject to the Legislative Reform Order procedure.

SPARQL queries used by this page

PREFIX id: <https://id.parliament.uk/> PREFIX : <https://id.parliament.uk/schema/> PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> SELECT ?Step ?stepName ?description ?scopeNote ?linkNote ?dateNote ?publicationName ?publicationUrl ?stepType ?stepTypeLabel ?CommonsId ?LordsId ?legislature ?legislatureName WHERE { ?Step a :ProcedureStep; :name ?stepName; :procedureStepHasProcedureStepType ?stepType. ?stepType :name ?stepTypeLabel. optional { ?Step :procedureStepDescription ?description} optional {?Step :procedureStepHasProcedureStepPublication ?publication. ?publication :procedureStepPublicationName ?publicationName; :procedureStepPublicationUrl ?publicationUrl.} optional {?Step :procedureStepScopeNote ?scopeNote} optional {?Step :procedureStepLinkNote ?linkNote} optional {?Step :procedureStepDateNote ?dateNote} optional {?Step :procedureStepInLegislature ?legislature. ?legislature :name ?legislatureName.} optional {?Step :procedureStepHasHouse ?CommonsId. filter (?CommonsId IN (id:1AFu55Hs))} optional {?Step :procedureStepHasHouse ?LordsId. filter (?LordsId IN (id:WkUWUBMx))} filter (?Step IN (id:BZaVHd9v))} PREFIX id: <https://id.parliament.uk/> PREFIX : <https://id.parliament.uk/schema/> PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> SELECT ?businessItem ?businessItemDate ?workPackage ?procedure ?procedureName ?workPackagedThing ?workpackagedThingName WHERE { ?Step a :ProcedureStep; :name ?stepName; :procedureStepHasBusinessItem ?businessItem. filter (?Step IN (id:BZaVHd9v)) optional{ ?businessItem :businessItemDate ?businessItemDate.} optional {?businessItem :businessItemHasBusinessItemWebLink ?businessItemLink } ?businessItem :businessItemHasWorkPackage ?workPackage. ?workPackage :workPackageHasProcedure ?procedure; :workPackageHasWorkPackagedThing ?workPackagedThing. ?procedure :name ?procedureName. ?workPackagedThing :name ?workpackagedThingName. } order by DESC(?businessItemDate) ?workpackagedThingName