Motion to consider the instrument lapsed at the end of session Routes
A step of type Business step.
A debate in a Grand Committee often takes place on a motion that “the Committee has considered” the statutory instrument. At the end of the debate, the Committee has to decide whether it agrees with the motion that it has considered the statutory instrument. Often this is agreed without a vote. Even if the Committee votes against the motion, the statutory instrument can still proceed to its next stage. This is because the motion is simply about whether the Committee has considered the statutory instrument. All motions lapse at the end of a session if they are still extant.
There are 8 routes.
-
A Route from ALM AC Decision to Motion to consider the instrument lapsed at the end of session (House of Lords) as part of the Affirmative Lords motions procedure
-
A Route from Motion to consider the instrument lapsed at the end of session (House of Lords) to ALM AB SUM as part of the Affirmative Lords motions procedure
-
A Route from ALM AC Decision to Motion to consider the instrument lapsed at the end of session (House of Lords) as part of the Draft affirmative procedure
-
A Route from Motion to consider the instrument lapsed at the end of session (House of Lords) to ALM AB SUM as part of the Draft affirmative procedure
-
A Route from ALM AC Decision to Motion to consider the instrument lapsed at the end of session (House of Lords) as part of the Enhanced affirmative: Investigatory Powers Act 2016 procedure
-
A Route from Motion to consider the instrument lapsed at the end of session (House of Lords) to ALM AB SUM as part of the Enhanced affirmative: Investigatory Powers Act 2016 procedure
-
A Route from ALM AC Decision to Motion to consider the instrument lapsed at the end of session (House of Lords) as part of the Made affirmative procedure
-
A Route from Motion to consider the instrument lapsed at the end of session (House of Lords) to ALM AB SUM as part of the Made affirmative procedure