Instrument has been determined to follow the affirmative procedure Business items

House of Commons and House of Lords

A step of type Business step.

A legislative reform order has been determined to follow the affirmative procedure if the minister has recommended such a procedure and a neither House has agreed to upgrade the order to follow the super-affirmative procedure. Or the minister has recommended the negative procedure and a committee of either House has agreed to upgrade the order to follow the affirmative procedure.

Overview Business items Routes Clocks Step collections Procedures with step depths Procedures

There are 5 business items.

RSS

1. Legislative Reform (Provision of Information etc. Relating to Disabilities) Order 2022

   On 28 June 2022, as part of a work package subject to the Legislative Reform Order procedure.

2. Legislative Reform (Renewal of National Radio Multiplex Licences) Order 2022

   On 15 March 2022, as part of a work package subject to the Legislative Reform Order procedure.

3. Legislative Reform (Renewal of Radio Licences) Order 2020

   On 22 July 2020, as part of a work package subject to the Legislative Reform Order procedure.

4. Legislative Reform (Constitution of the Council of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons) Order 2018

   On 18 April 2018, as part of a work package subject to the Legislative Reform Order procedure.

5. Legislative Reform (Regulator of Social Housing) (England) Order 2018

   On 18 April 2018, as part of a work package subject to the Legislative Reform Order procedure.

SPARQL queries used by this page

PREFIX id: <https://id.parliament.uk/> PREFIX : <https://id.parliament.uk/schema/> PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> SELECT ?Step ?stepName ?description ?scopeNote ?linkNote ?dateNote ?publicationName ?publicationUrl ?stepType ?stepTypeLabel ?CommonsId ?LordsId ?legislature ?legislatureName WHERE { ?Step a :ProcedureStep; :name ?stepName; :procedureStepHasProcedureStepType ?stepType. ?stepType :name ?stepTypeLabel. optional { ?Step :procedureStepDescription ?description} optional {?Step :procedureStepHasProcedureStepPublication ?publication. ?publication :procedureStepPublicationName ?publicationName; :procedureStepPublicationUrl ?publicationUrl.} optional {?Step :procedureStepScopeNote ?scopeNote} optional {?Step :procedureStepLinkNote ?linkNote} optional {?Step :procedureStepDateNote ?dateNote} optional {?Step :procedureStepInLegislature ?legislature. ?legislature :name ?legislatureName.} optional {?Step :procedureStepHasHouse ?CommonsId. filter (?CommonsId IN (id:1AFu55Hs))} optional {?Step :procedureStepHasHouse ?LordsId. filter (?LordsId IN (id:WkUWUBMx))} filter (?Step IN (id:qZsT5k59))} PREFIX id: <https://id.parliament.uk/> PREFIX : <https://id.parliament.uk/schema/> PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> SELECT ?businessItem ?businessItemDate ?workPackage ?procedure ?procedureName ?workPackagedThing ?workpackagedThingName WHERE { ?Step a :ProcedureStep; :name ?stepName; :procedureStepHasBusinessItem ?businessItem. filter (?Step IN (id:qZsT5k59)) optional{ ?businessItem :businessItemDate ?businessItemDate.} optional {?businessItem :businessItemHasBusinessItemWebLink ?businessItemLink } ?businessItem :businessItemHasWorkPackage ?workPackage. ?workPackage :workPackageHasProcedure ?procedure; :workPackageHasWorkPackagedThing ?workPackagedThing. ?procedure :name ?procedureName. ?workPackagedThing :name ?workpackagedThingName. } order by DESC(?businessItemDate) ?workpackagedThingName